{"id":18748,"date":"2014-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/?p=18748"},"modified":"2022-10-30T00:51:28","modified_gmt":"2022-10-30T00:51:28","slug":"effect-of-oversized-wheels-and-tires-on-suv-roll-stability","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/presentations-and-papers\/2014-cmrsc-ccmsr-xxiv-vancouver\/effect-of-oversized-wheels-and-tires-on-suv-roll-stability\/","title":{"rendered":"Effect of Oversized Wheels and Tires on SUV Roll Stability"},"content":{"rendered":"Author(s): Micky Gilbert, Brad Stolz<\/p>\n<h2>Slidedeck Presentation:<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/5C-Stolz_Effect-of-Oversized-Wheels-and-Tires-on-SUV-Roll-Stability.pdf\">5C Stolz_Effect of Oversized Wheels and Tires on SUV Roll Stability<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-divider su-divider-style-default\" style=\"margin:15px 0;border-width:1px;border-color:#ccc\"><\/div>\n<h2>Abstract:<\/h2>\n<p>There have been a number of untripped rollover accidents involving Sport-Utility Vehicles<br \/>\n(SUVs). Accident data shows that these vehicles are unstable when subjected to emergencytype<br \/>\nsteering maneuvers, and the physical characteristics of the vehicle are known to have<br \/>\ngreat impact on the vehicle\u2019s ability to resist rollover. The automotive industry and automobile<br \/>\nhandling\/stability engineers have studied the effect of vehicle design on rollover for decades.<br \/>\nPublished papers from the 1960-1970\u2019s discuss basic vehicle geometry as a primary factor on<br \/>\nrollover resistance. Track width and center of gravity height are referred to as first order metrics<br \/>\nwith respect to a vehicle\u2019s lateral force capacity by almost every auto manufacturer in the world.<br \/>\nThis means that a wide and low vehicle has more rollover resistance (and higher lateral force<br \/>\ncapacity) than a tall and narrow vehicle. Static Stability Factor (SSF) also known as T\/2H (track<br \/>\nwidth divided by two times the center of gravity height) is currently used by the National<br \/>\nHighway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to assign vehicle rollover performance ratings.<br \/>\nAt the same time, the well-established automotive aftermarket has been providing custom wheel<br \/>\nand tire packages for decades, and for vehicles of all types including SUVs. While some<br \/>\nprevious research has evaluated the consequence of the \u201cplus-sizing\u201d concept (wherein the<br \/>\noverall diameter is kept as close to original as possible), little work has been done to evaluate<br \/>\nthe potential consequence of installing wheels and tires that have notably different dimensions<br \/>\nthan stock (both in terms of physical dimensions and other characteristics). For example,<br \/>\nmodifications to an already unstable vehicle that result in raising the center of gravity height<br \/>\nand\/or narrowing the track width (or both) will result in a more unstable handling package in<br \/>\nterms of resistance to rollover.<br \/>\nThis paper will present data from instrumented rollover testing of an SUV with very low rollover<br \/>\nresistance with the intent of observing the effect of larger and heavier wheels. The purpose of<br \/>\nour testing was: (1) to test\/document the rollover threshold of the stock 1992 Ford Explorer XLT<br \/>\n4x2 with accepted industry handling maneuvers, and (2) to test\/document the rollover threshold<br \/>\nof the 1992 Ford Explorer XLT 4x2 modified with aftermarket 22-inch wheels with 18mm offset<br \/>\nand 265\/35R22 102V tires with the same accepted industry handling maneuvers. A comparison<br \/>\nof the two test setups will be used to establish a relationship between the change in the<br \/>\nwheel\/tire condition and the dynamic roll resistance of the vehicle as a whole.<\/p>\n<p><div class=\"su-divider su-divider-style-default\" style=\"margin:15px 0;border-width:1px;border-color:#ccc\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Micky Gilbert, Brad Stolz<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[128,346],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18748","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2014-cmrsc-ccmsr-xxiv-vancouver","category-research-and-evaluation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18748","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18748"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18748\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19781,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18748\/revisions\/19781"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18748"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18748"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18748"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}