{"id":18775,"date":"2014-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2014-06-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/?p=18775"},"modified":"2022-10-30T00:44:58","modified_gmt":"2022-10-30T00:44:58","slug":"public-opinion-survey-of-drugs-and-driving-in-canada","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/presentations-and-papers\/2014-cmrsc-ccmsr-xxiv-vancouver\/public-opinion-survey-of-drugs-and-driving-in-canada\/","title":{"rendered":"Public Opinion Survey of Drugs and Driving in Canada"},"content":{"rendered":"Author(s): Brian Jonah, Valerie Todd<\/p>\n<h2>Slidedeck Presentation:<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/06\/2B-Jonah_Public-Opinion-Survey-of-Drugs-and-Driving-in-Canada.pdf\">2B Jonah_Public Opinion Survey of Drugs and Driving in Canada<\/a><\/p>\n<div class=\"su-divider su-divider-style-default\" style=\"margin:15px 0;border-width:1px;border-color:#ccc\"><\/div>\n<h2>Abstract:<\/h2>\n<p>This survey addresses the public's awareness of the drugged driving problem, perception of its<br \/>\nnature, knowledge about legislation related to drug impaired driving, attitudes toward drug impaired<br \/>\ndriving and measures to deter it, and self-reported driving after the use of alcohol and\/or drugs. The<br \/>\nresults of the survey will help identify the target groups for public awareness campaigns and the<br \/>\nmessages that might resonate with various targets groups. A total of 1,500 licensed Canadians who<br \/>\nhad driven in the previous 30 days participated in the survey in November 2012. The sample was<br \/>\nregionally based so that comparisons could be made across the country. The response rate was<br \/>\n27%. About 80% of respondents were very concerned (6 or 7 on 7-point scale) about alcohol<br \/>\nimpaired driving, higher than that for using street drugs (e.g., cocaine) and driving (67%), or using<br \/>\ncannabis and driving (58%). While 85% knew that drug impaired driving is a criminal offence, only<br \/>\n16% knew that the licence suspension on conviction is 12 months. The majority (58%) were unsure<br \/>\nwhether their province\/territory has administrative laws dealing with drug impaired driving. While<br \/>\n26% thought alcohol impaired driving had increased during the past five years, 41% thought that<br \/>\ndriving while impaired by cannabis had increased. About 90% strongly agreed that alcohol impairs<br \/>\ndriving but only 68% agreed that cannabis impairs driving. While 64 % thought that it was very likely<br \/>\nthat a driver would be stopped and charged for alcohol impaired driving, only 26% believed this for<br \/>\ncannabis. About 16% of drivers said that they had driven after consuming more than one drink in the<br \/>\nlast 30 days, while this percentage was 9.8% for prescription drugs, 8.6% for non-prescription drugs,<br \/>\n2.4% for cannabis, and less that 1% for street drugs. There was strong support for measures such<br \/>\nas immediate three-day licence suspensions for drug impaired drivers (76%) and requiring drivers<br \/>\ninvolved in serious collisions to be tested for alcohol and drugs (84%) but not for random drug testing<br \/>\nfor drugs(46%). The results of the survey suggest some target groups for a public awareness<br \/>\ncampaign (e.g., young drivers who use cannabis) and the need to raise awareness about the<br \/>\nimpairing effects of illegal and some medicinal drugs.<\/p>\n<p><div class=\"su-divider su-divider-style-default\" style=\"margin:15px 0;border-width:1px;border-color:#ccc\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Brian Jonah, Valerie Todd<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":163,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_kad_post_transparent":"default","_kad_post_title":"default","_kad_post_layout":"default","_kad_post_sidebar_id":"","_kad_post_content_style":"default","_kad_post_vertical_padding":"default","_kad_post_feature":"","_kad_post_feature_position":"","_kad_post_header":false,"_kad_post_footer":false,"_kad_post_classname":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[128,346],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-18775","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-2014-cmrsc-ccmsr-xxiv-vancouver","category-research-and-evaluation"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18775","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/163"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18775"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18775\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":19768,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18775\/revisions\/19768"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18775"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18775"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/carsp.ca\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18775"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}